Hertzberg v. Hertzberg

247 A.D. 351, 287 N.Y.S. 418, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8261
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 247 A.D. 351 (Hertzberg v. Hertzberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hertzberg v. Hertzberg, 247 A.D. 351, 287 N.Y.S. 418, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record contains no proof of the marriage of the parties upon which a finding may be based that defendant under the law owes petitioner support and maintenance. We are [352]*352consequently unable to support the ruling made in the Domestic Relations Court, and it should be reversed and a new hearing ordered.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed and a new hearing ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hertzberg v. Hertzberg
251 A.D. 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Hertzberg v. Hertzberg
159 Misc. 644 (New York Family Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 351, 287 N.Y.S. 418, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertzberg-v-hertzberg-nyappdiv-1936.