Hertzberg v. Hertzberg
247 A.D. 351, 287 N.Y.S. 418, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8261
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The record contains no proof of the marriage of the parties upon which a finding may be based that defendant under the law owes petitioner support and maintenance. We are [352]*352consequently unable to support the ruling made in the Domestic Relations Court, and it should be reversed and a new hearing ordered.
Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed and a new hearing ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hertzberg v. Hertzberg, 247 A.D. 351, 287 N.Y.S. 418, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
247 A.D. 351 (Hertzberg v. Hertzberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hertzberg v. Hertzberg
251 A.D. 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Hertzberg v. Hertzberg
159 Misc. 644 (New York Family Court, 1936)