Hertz Vehs., LLC v. Active United Care Physical Therapy, PLLC

2026 NY Slip Op 30669(U)
New York Supreme Court, New York County·Decided February 24, 2026·No. Index No. 160369/2023·Unpublished·Matthew V. Grieco

Opinion

Hertz Vehs., LLC v Active United Care Physical Therapy, PLLC

2026 NY Slip Op 30669(U)

February 24, 2026

Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160369/2023 Judge: Matthew V. Grieco

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.

This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1603692023.NEW_YORK.002.LBLX000_TO.html[03/09/2026 3:45:54 PM]

!FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/25/2026 02:46 P~ INDEX NO. 160369/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 86 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/25/2026

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY

PRESENT: HON. MATTHEW V. GRIECO PART 30M Justice

--------------------------------X INDEX NO. 160369/2023 HERlZ VEHICLES, LLC,

MOTION DATE 02/09/2026 Plaintiff,

MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 -v-

ACTIVE UNITED CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY, PLLC,ALL CITY FAMILY HEALTHCARE, INC.,AMERIPATH NEW YORK, LLC,BEST CARE WELLNESS CENTER, LLC,BETTER SOON RX, INC.,CCCP EQUIPMENT, INC.,CHAYIM MED PRODUCTS CORP., CHIROPRACTIC EVALUATION SERVICE, P.C.,ERNEST BONAPARTE, FAR ROCKAWAY MEDICAL, P.C.,GARDEN MEDICAL CARE, P.C.,HOLLIS DRUGS, INC.,KENCO CARE SUPPLY DECISION + ORDER ON

CORP., ONE HAND 1 PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C.,OPTIMAL HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC AND MOTION ACPUNCTURE, P.C.,REFUAH DIAGNOSTICS, LLC,SENECA AVENUE ACUPUNCTURE, P.C.,STAR MEDICAL IMAGING, P.C.,TITAN DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING SERVICES, INC.,TOTAL ANESTHESIA PROVIDER, P.C.,DEJA TAITT, DUVON RUSSELL, JARIUF PLEASANTS

Defendant.

----------------------------------------X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 were read on this motion to/for AMEND CAPTION/PLEADINGS

Upon the foregoing documents, and for the reasons stated infra, plaintiff's motion to amend the pleadings is granted.

Plaintiff, Hertz Vehicles, LLC, moves pursuant to CPLR 3025(b) for leave to amend the pleadings to add as defendants Chai Diagnostics LLC, Diagnostic Neurology, P.C., and Longevity Medical Supply. Inc.

160369/2023 HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC vs. ACTIVE UNITED CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY, PLLC ET Page 1 of 4 AL Motion No. 002

1 of 4

!FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/25/2026 02:46 P~ INDEX NO. 160369/2023 1

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 86 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/25/2026

On October 24, 2023, plaintiff commenced this action for a declaratory judgment that it owes no duty to pay any no-fault claims arising out of an alleged motor vehicle collision on December 18, 2022, on the ground that defendants claimants Jariuf Pleasants, Deja Taitt, and Duvon Russell did not comply with their obligations concerning examinations under oath, which constituted breaches of a condition precedent, vitiating coverage (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1 [Summons and Complaint]). Plaintiff filed an amendedcomplaintasofright on November 16, 2023 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 3; see CPLR 3025[a]). By order entered March 19, 2025, the Court (Arthur F. Engoran, J.) granted default judgment against the non-answering defendants: the three claimants and multiple medical providers (NYSCEF Doc. No. 70 [Decision and Order]).

Plaintiff now seeks leave to file and serve a second amended com plaint (NYSCEF Doc. No. 77 [Proposed Second Amended Summons and Complaint]) to add as defendants three providers it asserts were previously unknown to it and from which it has recently received medical bills for services purportedly rendered to the claimants (NYSCEF Doc. No. 73 [Aff. in Support of Motion]; Doc. No. 75 [Aff. of Hertz Claims Adjuster]). The motion is unopposed.

Leave to amend a pleading should be freely granted, absent prejudice to the non-

moving party (see Davis v South Nassau Communities Hosp., 26 NY3d 563, 580 [2015]; CPLR 3025[b]). Prejudice requires some indication that the defendants have been hindered in the preparation of their case or have been prevented from taking some measure in support of their position (see Kocourek v Boaz Allen Hamilton, Inc., 85 AD3d 502,504 [1 st Dept 2011]). Even under that liberal standard, however, the proposed pleading must not be devoid of merit (see id.; Reyes v BSP Realty Corp., 171

AD3d 504 [1 st Dept 2019]) and there must be "appropriate substantiation" as 160369/2023 HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC vs. ACTIVE UNITED CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY, PLLC ET Page 2 of 4 AL Motion No. 002

2 of 4

!FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/25/2026 02:46 P~ INDEX NO. 160369/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 86 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/25/2026

circumstances dictate (Hoppe v Bd. of Directors of 51-78 Owners Corp., 49 AD3d 477 [1 st Dept 2008]; see Briggs v New York City Tr. Auth., 132 AD2d 451 [1 st Dept 1987] [affidavit of merits needed to explain reasons for delay and facts warranting increased ad damn um clause]; Velarde v City of New York, 149 AD3d 457 [1 st Dept 2017] [evidentiary proof that could be considered on a motion for summary judgment required to show defendants acted recklessly or in concert with assailant, rather than negligently]).

Here, plaintiff's submissions, including an affirmation from its claims adjuster, establish the reason for the delay in naming the new defendants and the merits of the proposed pleading.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the amended complaint is granted; and it is further ORDERED that the second amended complaint, in the form annexed to the motion papers, shall be deemed served upon service of a copy of this order with notice of entry upon all parties who have appeared in the action; and it is further ORDERED that a supplemental summons and second amended complaint, in the form annexed to the motion papers, shall be served, in accordance with the Civil Practice Law and Rules, upon the additional parties in this action within 30 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry; and it is further ORDERED that the action shall bear the following caption:

160369/2023 HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC vs. ACTIVE UNITED CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY, PLLC ET Page 3 of 4 AL Motion No. 002

3 of 4

!FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/25/2026 02:46 P~ INDEX NO. 160369/2023 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 86 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/25/2026

HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

ACTIVE UNITED CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY PLLC, ALL CITY FAMILY HEALTHCARE, INC., AMERIPATH NEW YORK LLC, BEST CARE WELLNESS CENTER LLC, BETTER SOON RX INC., CCCP EQUIPMENT, INC., CHAYIM MED PRODUCTS CORP, CHIROPRACTIC EVALUATION SERVICE, P.C., ERNEST BONAPARTE, ETMCPHARMACY, INC., EXPRESS DME, INC., FAR ROCKAWAY MEDICAL P.C., GARDEN MEDICAL CARE, P.C., HOLLIS DRUGS INC., KENCO CARE SUPPLY CORP, ONE HAND 1 PHYSICAL THERAPY P.C., OPTIMAL HEALTH CHIROPRACTIC AND ACUPUNCTURE P.C., REFUAH DIAGNOSTICS LLC, SENECA AVENUE ACUPUNCTURE P.C., STAR MEDICAL IMAGING P.C., TITAN DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING SERVICES INC., TOTAL ANESTHESIA PROVIDER P.C., CHAI DIAGNOSTICS LLC, DIAGNOSTIC NEUROLOGY, P.C., LONGEVITY MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC., DEJA TAITT, DUVON RUSSELL and JARIUF PLEASANTS

Defendant(s).

And it is further

ORDERED that counsel for the moving party shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon the County Clerk and the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark the court's records to reflect the parties being added pursuant hereto; and it is further ORDERED that such service upon the County Clerk and the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website).

DATE MATTHEW V. GRIECO, J.S.C.

CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE

160369/2023 HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC vs. ACTIVE UNITED CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY, PLLC ET Page 4 of 4 AL Motion No. 002

4 of 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hertz Vehs., LLC v. Active United Care Physical Therapy, PLLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 30669(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

2026 NY Slip Op 30669(U) (Hertz Vehs., LLC v. Active United Care Physical Therapy, PLLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. South Nassau Communities Hospital
46 N.E.3d 614 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
Velarde v. City of New York
2017 NY Slip Op 2743 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Hoppe v. Board of Directors of 51-78 Owners Corp.
49 A.D.3d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Kocourek v. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
85 A.D.3d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)