Hertz Vehs., LLC v. A & R Med. Supply Corp

2026 NY Slip Op 30929(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMarch 9, 2026
DocketIndex No. 151977/2025
StatusUnpublished
AuthorMatthew V. Grieco

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 30929(U) (Hertz Vehs., LLC v. A & R Med. Supply Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hertz Vehs., LLC v. A & R Med. Supply Corp, 2026 NY Slip Op 30929(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

Hertz Vehs., LLC v A & R Med. Supply Corp 2026 NY Slip Op 30929(U) March 9, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 151977/2025 Judge: Matthew V. Grieco Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.1519772025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/20/2026 3:45:58 PM] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 04:23 P~ INDEX NO. 151977/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MATTHEW V. GRIECO PART 30M Justice -------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 151977/2025 HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC, AND ALL OF ITS AFFILIATES MOTION DATE 10/07/2025 AND SUBSIDIARIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE HERTZ CORPORATION, AND HERTZ CO., MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 Plaintiff,

- V -

A AND R MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP, ACCELERATED SURGICAL CENTER A/KIA ACCELERATED SURGICAL CENTER OF NORTH JERSEY, LLC, AMERICAN MEDICAL INITIATIVES, P.C., BARNERT AAS, P.C., CENTER MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC., DEMCH MEDEX CORP, ETMC PHARMACY INC., FAT RABBIT ORTHOPEDICS, PLLC, LINDEN BLVD SUPPLIES, INC., M & R EXPRESS DECISION + ORDER ON MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC., M.S. PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C., MOTION ORTHOCARE SOLUTIONS, INC., PREVAIL PHARMACY, INC., STAR LIGHT SUPPLY, LLC, TITAN DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING SERVICES, INC., TOP STAR SUPPLIES, INC., UPTOWN HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT, INC. D/B/A EAST TREMONT MEDICAL CENTER, YS HEALTHCARE CHIROPRACTIC DIAGNOSTIC, P.C., LEON WHICHARD, MATTHEW BROWN

Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT

Upon the foregoing documents, and for the reasons stated infra, plaintiffs

motion for a default judgment is granted.

On February 12, 2025, plaintiff, Hertz Vehicles, LLC, and All of Its Affiliates and

Subsidiaries, Including but Not Limited to the Hertz Corporation and Hertz Co.

("Hertz"), commenced this action for a declaratory judgment that it owes no duty to pay

any no-fault claims arising out of a motor vehicle collision that allegedly occurred on

July 22, 2024, on the ground that the claimants defendants, Leon Justin Whichard and

151977/2025 HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC, AND ALL OF ITS AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES, Page 1 of 5 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE HERTZ CORPORATION, AND HERTZ CO. vs. A AND R MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP ET AL Motion No. 001

1 of 5 [* 1] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 04:23 P~ INDEX NO. 151977/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026

Matthew Brown, each failed to appear for duly and properly requested examinations

under oath ("EUOs") on two occasions, which constituted a violation of a condition

precedent to coverage by the terms of the policy and under the no-fault regulations

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 1 [Summons and Complaint]).

Defendants Accelerated Surgical Center a/k/ a Accelerated Surgical Center of

North Jersey, LLC, Barnert AAS, P.C., ETMC Pharmacy Inc., Fat Rabbit Orthopedics,

PLLC, Uptown Health Care Management, Inc. d/b/a East Tremont Medical Center, and

YS Healthcare Chiropractic Diagnostic, P.C filed timely answers (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 21,

23). Plaintiff has been unable to locate the claimants, Whichard and Brown, for service

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 36 at 2 n. 2).

On October 7, 2025, plaintiff moved for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR

3215 against all the served non-answering defendants (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 35-36).

By stipulation dated January 8, 2026 NYSCEF Doc. No. 56), plaintiff accepted

the late answer of defendants A and R Medical Supply Corp., Linden Blvd. Supplies,

Inc., and M & R Express Medical Supply, Inc. (NYSCEF Doc. No. 31), and withdrew its

default judgment motion as to them.

Plaintiff now seeks default judgment against the remaining non-answering

defendants: American Medical Initiatives, P.C., Center Medical Supplies, Inc., Demch

Medex Corp., M.S. Physical Therapy, P.C., Orthocare Solutions, Inc., Prevail Pharmacy,

Inc., Star Light Supply, LLC, Titan Diagnostic Imaging Services, Inc., and Top Star

Supplies, Inc.

A plaintiff seeking default judgment against a non-appearing defendant must

move within one year of the default (see CPLR 3215[c]), and file proof of: (1) service of

151977/2025 HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC, AND ALL OF ITS AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES, Page 2 of 5 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE HERTZ CORPORATION, AND HERTZ CO. vs. A AND R MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP ET AL Motion No. 001

2 of 5 [* 2] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 04:23 P~ INDEX NO. 151977/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026

the summons and complaint, or summons with notice; (2) the facts constituting the

claim; and (3) the default (see CPLR 3215[f]; Bigio v Gooding, 213 AD3d 480,481 [1 st

Dept 2023]).

To establish the "facts constituting the claim," the movant need only demonstrate

"enough facts to enable a court to determine that a viable cause of action exists"

(Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 71 [2003]), which can be effected by

affidavit of a party or by verified complaint, if one has been properly served (see id. at

70; CPLR 3215[f]). The "standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some

firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531, 535 [1st Dept 1987]).

"The failure of a person eligible for no-fault benefits to appear for a properly

noticed EUO constitutes a breach of a condition precedent vitiating coverage" (Mapfre

Ins. Co. of New York v Manoo, 140 AD3d 468, 470 [1st Dept 2016]).

Here, plaintiff has demonstrated that it is entitled to a default judgment by

submitting, inter alia: the summons and verified complaint (NYSCEF Doc. No. 1);

affidavits of service and additional service in compliance with CPLR 3215(g)(4)

(NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 4, 6-7, 12-17, 33-34); an affirmation of a claims adjuster, employed

by a third-party administrator for Hertz, ESIS, Inc., attesting to claims received from or

on behalf of claimants Whichard and Brown, the reasons Hertz requested EUOs for both

claimants, the timely mailing and scheduling of at least two EUOs for each claimant, and

both claimants' failure to appear at any EUO (NYSCEF Doc. No. 38); affirmations of an

attorney, attesting to his firm's business practices in generating and mailing EUO

notices, his review of the files, and his personal presence and both claimants' failure to

appear at all the scheduled EUOs (NYSCEF Doc. No. 37, 43); a police accident report

151977/2025 HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC, AND ALL OF ITS AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES, Page 3 of 5 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE HERTZ CORPORATION, AND HERTZ CO. vs. A AND R MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP ET AL Motion No. 001

3 of 5 [* 3] !FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2026 04:23 P~ INDEX NO. 151977/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2026

(NYSCEF Doc. No. 41); no-fault claims forms (NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 44-45); EUO

scheduling letters with affidavits of service (NYSCEF Doc. No. 43); and an affirmation of

counsel in support of the motion (NYSCEF Doc. No. 36).

It is therefore

ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment is granted as to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.
790 N.E.2d 1156 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
Mapfre Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Manoo
140 A.D.3d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Joosten v. Gale
129 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 30929(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertz-vehs-llc-v-a-r-med-supply-corp-nysupctnewyork-2026.