Hertz v. Minzesheimer

City of New York Municipal Court

Hertz v. Minzesheimer

10 Misc. 779

DecidedJuly 1, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 779 (Hertz v. Minzesheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hertz v. Minzesheimer, 10 Misc. 779 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The action was for brokerage, and the contention narrowed down to the question whether the defend[780]*780ant was to pay the plaintiff $500, or one-half of one per cent of the price received by the defendant, which latter sum, amounting to $157.50, defendant paid to the plaintiff, who received the same and claimed it to be on account of the $500.

The evidence is conflicting, and the jury, under a clear and impartial charge, found for the plaintiff.

We find no reason to disturb the verdict, and the judgment entered thereon must be affirmed, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The action was for brokerage, and the contention narrowed down to the question whether the defend[780]*780ant was to pay the plaintiff $500, or one-half of one per cent of the price received by the defendant, which latter sum, amounting to $157.50, defendant paid to the plaintiff, who received the same and claimed it to be on account of the $500.

The evidence is conflicting, and the jury, under a clear and impartial charge, found for the plaintiff.

We find no reason to disturb the verdict, and the judgment entered thereon must be affirmed, with costs.

Newburger, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Misc. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertz-v-minzesheimer-nynyccityct-1894.