Hertz v. Manhattan Railway Co.

94 N.Y.S. 1149

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, by striking out the provision for an extra allowance, for want of power in the court at Trial Term to grant the same, and judgment as modified and order unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hertz v. Manhattan Railway Co., 94 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

94 N.Y.S. 1149 (Hertz v. Manhattan Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.