Hertz v. Manhattan Railway Co.

94 N.Y.S. 1149

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 1149 (Hertz v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hertz v. Manhattan Railway Co., 94 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment modified, by striking out the provision for an extra allowance, for want of power in the court at Trial Term to grant the same, and judgment as modified and order unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertz-v-manhattan-railway-co-nyappdiv-1905.