Hertz v. Huttner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hertz v. Huttner

221 A.D.2d 341, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11651

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 221 A.D.2d 341 (Hertz v. Huttner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hertz v. Huttner, 221 A.D.2d 341, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to vacate (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated June 20, 1995, which held Sheldon Hertz in contempt of court for his failure to report for jury service, and (2) an order of the same court, dated June 27, 1995, which, inter alia, directed the Sheriff to arrest Sheldon Hertz and produce him before the court forthwith, and to prohibit enforcement of that judgment and order.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the judgment and order were superseded by order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 3, 1995. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to vacate (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated June 20, 1995, which held Sheldon Hertz in contempt of court for his failure to report for jury service, and (2) an order of the same court, dated June 27, 1995, which, inter alia, directed the Sheriff to arrest Sheldon Hertz and produce him before the court forthwith, and to prohibit enforcement of that judgment and order.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the judgment and order were superseded by order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 3, 1995. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 341, 633 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertz-v-huttner-nyappdiv-1995.