Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Florida

Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts

183 So. 2d 687, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3732

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 9, 1966

DocketNo. 34502

StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 2d 687 (Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts, 183 So. 2d 687, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3732 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have before us for our consideration and determination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, First District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in decisions.

After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having carefully considered the opinion filed in this case by the District Court of Appeal, First District, (Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts [Fla.App. 1st] 174 So.2d 437) in explanation and support of its decision, we have concluded that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI