Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Florida

Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts

183 So. 2d 687, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3732

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 9, 1966·No. No. 34502·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have before us for our consideration and determination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, First District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in decisions.

After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having carefully considered the opinion filed in this case by the District Court of Appeal, First District, (Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts [Fla.App. 1st] 174 So.2d 437) in explanation and support of its decision, we have concluded that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have before us for our consideration and determination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, First District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in decisions.

After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having carefully considered the opinion filed in this case by the District Court of Appeal, First District, (Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts [Fla.App. 1st] 174 So.2d 437) in explanation and support of its decision, we have concluded that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts, 183 So. 2d 687, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3732 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

183 So. 2d 687 (Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related