Hertz Corporation v. Stanislav Babayev and Oleg Chikov

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedDecember 24, 2024
Docket24SC183
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hertz Corporation v. Stanislav Babayev and Oleg Chikov (Hertz Corporation v. Stanislav Babayev and Oleg Chikov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hertz Corporation v. Stanislav Babayev and Oleg Chikov, (Colo. 2024).

Opinion

Hertz Corporation, Petitioner
v.
Stanislav Babayev and Oleg Chikov, Respondents

No. 24SC183

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc

December 24, 2024


          Court of Appeals Case No. 23CA117

         Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.

         Whether, after the legislative abrogation of Passamano v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 882 P.2d 1312 (Colo. 1994), a "motor vehicle rental company" may be considered a statutory or de facto "insurer," where its rental agreement incidentally offers customers the option of purchasing insurance coverage provided by a licensed, third-party insurer under the rental company's own pre-existing policy with that insurer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Passamano v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
882 P.2d 1312 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hertz Corporation v. Stanislav Babayev and Oleg Chikov, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertz-corporation-v-stanislav-babayev-and-oleg-chikov-colo-2024.