Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/HERTZ CORPORATION v. CITY OF SYRACUSE

HERTZ CORPORATION v. CITY OF SYRACUSE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 2013·No. CA 12-01956·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

743 CA 12-01956 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE HERTZ CORPORATION AND HERTZ VEHICLES LLC, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

CITY OF SYRACUSE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, AND JOHN’S AUTO BODY SERVICE, LLC, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

JOHN W. BRANDT, PHOENIX, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

GOLDBERG SEGALLA, LLP, SYRACUSE (CORY A. DECRESENZA OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered July 5, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of respondent John’s Auto Body Service, LLC for leave to renew and, upon renewal, adhered to an order entered April 17, 2012.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 14, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HERTZ CORPORATION v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

HERTZ CORPORATION v. CITY OF SYRACUSE (HERTZ CORPORATION v. CITY OF SYRACUSE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.