Hertz Corp. v. Knoechel
819 So. 2d 886, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7706, 2002 WL 1174358
This text of 819 So. 2d 886 (Hertz Corp. v. Knoechel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hertz Corp. v. Knoechel, 819 So. 2d 886, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7706, 2002 WL 1174358 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinions
Finding no valid reason for the trial court’s order compelling production of documents protected by the attorney-client and work product privileges, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the lower court’s order.
Certiorari granted.
GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hialeah Hotel, Inc. v. Talley
790 So. 2d 466 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
819 So. 2d 886, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7706, 2002 WL 1174358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertz-corp-v-knoechel-fladistctapp-2002.