Hertz Corp. v. City of Syracuse

107 A.D.3d 1596, 967 N.Y.S.2d 863

This text of 107 A.D.3d 1596 (Hertz Corp. v. City of Syracuse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hertz Corp. v. City of Syracuse, 107 A.D.3d 1596, 967 N.Y.S.2d 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered July 5, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order, inter alia, granted the motion of respondent John’s Auto Body Service, LLC for leave to renew and, upon renewal, adhered to an order entered April 17, 2012.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Fahey, Carni and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A.D.3d 1596, 967 N.Y.S.2d 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertz-corp-v-city-of-syracuse-nyappdiv-2013.