Hertz Corp. v. Amica Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Hertz Corp. v. Amica Mutual Insurance

717 A.2d 235, 245 Conn. 920, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 281

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 2, 1998·No. SC 15967·Published

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 918 (AC 17247), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In a declaratory judgment action where the plaintiff sought declaratory relief with respect to whether it or the defendant insurer was responsible for providing primary insurance coverage in a pending underlying tort case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court dismissing the declaratory judgment action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the grounds such action was premature?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 918 (AC 17247), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In a declaratory judgment action where the plaintiff sought declaratory relief with respect to whether it or the defendant insurer was responsible for providing primary insurance coverage in a pending underlying tort case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court dismissing the declaratory judgment action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the grounds such action was premature?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Hertz Corp. v. Amica Mutual Insurance, 717 A.2d 235, 245 Conn. 920, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 281 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

717 A.2d 235 (Hertz Corp. v. Amica Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.