Herter v. Muser
This text of 29 Misc. 641 (Herter v. Muser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon oral pleadings, the plaintiff brought this action to recover rent under an oral letting for one year in futuro, with renewal privilege, crediting upon his claim moneys received at the making of the contract and from subsequent letting on account. A renting of the premises was admitted by the defendant, who disputed the commencement, without denying the duration, of the term. There was thus presented a question of fact, and no reason appears for disturbing the determination of the trial justice either as to the fact or law, the time intermediate the making of the lease and its commencement in possession being no part of the term and so not within the statute. Young v. Dake, 5 N. Y. 463.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Fbeedman, P. J., and Leventbitt, J., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Misc. 641, 61 N.Y.S. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herter-v-muser-nyappterm-1899.