Herter v. Goss & Edsall Co.
39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 268, 30 Vroom 268, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 37
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herter v. Goss & Edsall Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 N.J.L. 42 →
Opinion
The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
[269]*269For affirmance—The Chancellor, Gummere, Eeed, Van Syckel, Brown. 5.
For reversal—Dixon, Bogert,. Krueger, Sims. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herter v. Goss & Edsall Co., 39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 268, 30 Vroom 268, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 37 (N.J. 1896).
39 A. 1113 (Herter v. Goss & Edsall Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.