Herter v. Goss & Edsall Co.
39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 268, 30 Vroom 268, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 37
This text of 39 A. 1113 (Herter v. Goss & Edsall Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Herter v. Goss & Edsall Co., 39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 268, 30 Vroom 268, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 37 (N.J. 1896).
Opinion
The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
[269]*269For affirmance—The Chancellor, Gummere, Eeed, Van Syckel, Brown. 5.
For reversal—Dixon, Bogert,. Krueger, Sims. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 A. 1113, 59 N.J.L. 268, 30 Vroom 268, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herter-v-goss-edsall-co-nj-1896.