Herskowitz v. Herskowitz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Herskowitz v. Herskowitz

379 So. 2d 135, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16320

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 1979

DocketNo. 78-1956

StatusPublished

This text of 379 So. 2d 135 (Herskowitz v. Herskowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herskowitz v. Herskowitz, 379 So. 2d 135, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16320 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is affirmed upon a holding that (1) the trial court had jurisdiction to enter such order, James v. James, 64 So.2d 534, 536 (Fla.1953), and (2) the appellant waived for appellate purposes any objection thereto by (a) failing to object to, and, indeed, impliedly inviting the order appealed from in the trial court, Hawkins v. Perry, 146 Fla. 766, 1 So.2d 620 (1941); 3 Fla.Jur.2d “Appellate Review” 347 (1978), and (b) failing to appeal from, and complying with a prior order of the trial court which required the appellant to make substantially the same accounting as the order now under review. Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175 (1943); Herman A. Thomas, Inc. v. Sharpe, 309 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order under review is affirmed upon a holding that (1) the trial court had jurisdiction to enter such order, James v. James, 64 So.2d 534, 536 (Fla.1953), and (2) the appellant waived for appellate purposes any objection thereto by (a) failing to object to, and, indeed, impliedly inviting the order appealed from in the trial court, Hawkins v. Perry, 146 Fla. 766, 1 So.2d 620 (1941); 3 Fla.Jur.2d “Appellate Review” 347 (1978), and (b) failing to appeal from, and complying with a prior order of the trial court which required the appellant to make substantially the same accounting as the order now under review. Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175 (1943); Herman A. Thomas, Inc. v. Sharpe, 309 So.2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

379 So. 2d 135, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herskowitz-v-herskowitz-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack