Hershkowitz v. Merl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hershkowitz v. Merl

32 A.D.2d 564, 300 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4117

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 564 (Hershkowitz v. Merl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hershkowitz v. Merl, 32 A.D.2d 564, 300 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiffs, as limited by their brief, from the portion a of the Supreme Court, Kings County, as amended by order of said court dated June 19, 1968, which is in favor of defendants Merl upon a directed verdict at a trial solely on the issues of liability; and cross appeals by all the parties from an order of the same court, dated June 29, 1965, which denied the separate motions of all the parties for summary judgment. Amended judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to defendants Merl against plaintiffs. No opinion. Appeals from the order dismissed, without costs. These appeals are academic, since the parties went to trial before perfection of the appeals; and since judgment was entered after trial. Further insofar as taken by plaintiffs and defendant Sevel Hotel Corporation (from respective parts of the order) the appeals have been abandoned. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiffs, as limited by their brief, from the portion a of the Supreme Court, Kings County, as amended by order of said court dated June 19, 1968, which is in favor of defendants Merl upon a directed verdict at a trial solely on the issues of liability; and cross appeals by all the parties from an order of the same court, dated June 29, 1965, which denied the separate motions of all the parties for summary judgment. Amended judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to defendants Merl against plaintiffs. No opinion. Appeals from the order dismissed, without costs. These appeals are academic, since the parties went to trial before perfection of the appeals; and since judgment was entered after trial. Further insofar as taken by plaintiffs and defendant Sevel Hotel Corporation (from respective parts of the order) the appeals have been abandoned. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 564, 300 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hershkowitz-v-merl-nyappdiv-1969.