Hershfield v. Griffith

85 U.S. 657, 21 L. Ed. 968, 18 Wall. 657, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1342
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 18, 1874·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice BRADLEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only point made in this case is,- that being one of equity jurisdiction it was tried by jury as an action at law. This being so it would seem that, under the seventh article of amendments to the Constitution, it should have been removed by writ of error and not by appeal. But that aside, *659 we have just decided in Hornbuckle v. Toombs that equitable as well as legal relief maybe pursued by the form of action prescribed by the Territorial legislature. There is no complaint that this was not done, or. that substantial justice was not administered between the parties.

Judgment aebtrmed.

Dissenting, Justices CLIFFORD, DAVIS, and STRONG.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hershfield v. Griffith, 85 U.S. 657, 21 L. Ed. 968, 18 Wall. 657, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1342 (1874).

85 U.S. 657 (Hershfield v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hatchett v. Government of Guam
212 F.2d 767 (Ninth Circuit, 1954)
Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona Railroad
129 U.S. 291 (Supreme Court, 1889)