Hershfield v. Griffith

85 U.S. 657, 21 L. Ed. 968, 18 Wall. 657, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1342
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 18, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 85 U.S. 657 (Hershfield v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hershfield v. Griffith, 85 U.S. 657, 21 L. Ed. 968, 18 Wall. 657, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1342 (1874).

Opinion

Mr. Justice BRADLEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only point made in this case is,- that being one of equity jurisdiction it was tried by jury as an action at law. This being so it would seem that, under the seventh article of amendments to the Constitution, it should have been removed by writ of error and not by appeal. But that aside, *659 we have just decided in Hornbuckle v. Toombs that equitable as well as legal relief maybe pursued by the form of action prescribed by the Territorial legislature. There is no complaint that this was not done, or. that substantial justice was not administered between the parties.

Judgment aebtrmed.

Dissenting, Justices CLIFFORD, DAVIS, and STRONG.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hatchett v. Government of Guam
212 F.2d 767 (Ninth Circuit, 1954)
Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona Railroad
129 U.S. 291 (Supreme Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 U.S. 657, 21 L. Ed. 968, 18 Wall. 657, 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hershfield-v-griffith-scotus-1874.