Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. The Steamship Mars

Third Circuit

Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. The Steamship Mars

273 F.2d 617

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 29, 1960·No. No. 12972·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question before us is whether Judge Egan in the district court properly decided that the appellees were not [618] responsible for spoilage of the part of the cargo involved. We think he did. There is substantial testimony in the record fully justifying that decision.

The findings and conclusions of the district court on this phase of the suit, 172 F.Supp. 321, will be affirmed and the case remanded to the district court for the purpose of entering judgment thereon in favor of the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole question before us is whether Judge Egan in the district court properly decided that the appellees were not [618] responsible for spoilage of the part of the cargo involved. We think he did. There is substantial testimony in the record fully justifying that decision.

The findings and conclusions of the district court on this phase of the suit, 172 F.Supp. 321, will be affirmed and the case remanded to the district court for the purpose of entering judgment thereon in favor of the defendants.

Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. The Steamship Mars, 273 F.2d 617 (3d Cir. 1960).

Pincite

273 F.2d 617 (Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. The Steamship Mars) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related