Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. The Steamship Mars

Third Circuit

Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. The Steamship Mars

273 F.2d 617

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 29, 1960

DocketNo. 12972

StatusPublished

This text of 273 F.2d 617 (Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. The Steamship Mars) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hershey Chocolate Corp. v. The Steamship Mars, 273 F.2d 617 (3d Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole question before us is whether Judge Egan in the district court properly decided that the appellees were not [618]*618responsible for spoilage of the part of the cargo involved. We think he did. There is substantial testimony in the record fully justifying that decision.

The findings and conclusions of the district court on this phase of the suit, 172 F.Supp. 321, will be affirmed and the case remanded to the district court for the purpose of entering judgment thereon in favor of the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole question before us is whether Judge Egan in the district court properly decided that the appellees were not [618]*618responsible for spoilage of the part of the cargo involved. We think he did. There is substantial testimony in the record fully justifying that decision.

The findings and conclusions of the district court on this phase of the suit, 172 F.Supp. 321, will be affirmed and the case remanded to the district court for the purpose of entering judgment thereon in favor of the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 F.2d 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hershey-chocolate-corp-v-the-steamship-mars-ca3-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack