Hershey Beverage Corp. v. City of Schenectady

249 A.D. 668, 291 N.Y.S. 256, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5458
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 11, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff brought a negligence action against the defendant city for damages due to the flooding of its premises. It is alleged that the city failed to install and maintain “ Sewers of size sufficient to drain said rainfall with[669]*669out flooding the street,” and by improperly installing a sewer drain in the street; that plaintiff’s premises were flooded on two separate dates, during and after rain storms. The answer is a general denial. The jury could have found from the evidence that plaintiff’s cellar was damp at all times; that its premises were at a low level in that section of the city; that the sewers were adequate for ordinary needs; that the sewers were in good condition; that on the days in question the rainfall was of extraordinary quantity; that the plaintiff’s own outlets to the sewers were not properly maintained. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action. Judgment, and order denying motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hershey Beverage Corp. v. City of Schenectady, 249 A.D. 668, 291 N.Y.S. 256, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

249 A.D. 668 (Hershey Beverage Corp. v. City of Schenectady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamilton v. City of Bismarck
300 N.W. 631 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1941)