Hershberger v. Lynch

11 A. 642, 9 Sadler 91, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 476
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 11, 1887·No. No. 124, W. D.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The complaint in this case is that the defendant’s points were not clearly answered. Those points could not well be answered without some explanation; hence, they were so qualified as to give the jury proper instructions on the law governing the case. The charge as a whole was certainly clear enough, aud by it tbe jury could not have been misled.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hershberger v. Lynch, 11 A. 642, 9 Sadler 91, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 476 (Pa. 1887).

11 A. 642 (Hershberger v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matlack v. Chalfant
69 Pa. Super. 49 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Wallace v. Keystone Automobile Co.
86 A. 699 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
John H. Radel Co. v. Borches
145 S.W. 155 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)