Hershberg v. Morrison

89 A. 302, 77 N.H. 589, 1913 N.H. LEXIS 59
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 2, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A. 302 (Hershberg v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hershberg v. Morrison, 89 A. 302, 77 N.H. 589, 1913 N.H. LEXIS 59 (N.H. 1913).

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

No question of law which requires consideration is presented. Whether the defendant reasonably understood the contract to give him the right of return was a question of fact. That fact being found for him, there was no contract to accept the goods upon delivery. Not having agreed to accept and keep the goods, the defendant is not liable for not doing so. Evidence of the *590 defendant’s general custom was excluded. The salesman’s statement that he could use the defendant better than before raised the question how he had before used him. The defendant could tell the jury what he knew about it. His credibility was for them.

Exceptions overruled.

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A. 302, 77 N.H. 589, 1913 N.H. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hershberg-v-morrison-nh-1913.