Herschkowitz v. Keen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herschkowitz v. Keen

256 A.D. 824, 9 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5029

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 824 (Herschkowitz v. Keen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herschkowitz v. Keen, 256 A.D. 824, 9 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

The appellant, subpoenaed to appear as a third party in supplementary proceedings, moved to vacate the subpoena on the ground that the judgment on which said proceedings were based had been discharged in bankruptcy. The motion was denied. An examination of the record on appeal in the action, submitted by stipulation on this appeal, furnishes conclusive evidence that the judgment was one rendered against the defendant in an action to recover damages for false and fraudulent representations in the sale of a mortgage. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appellant, subpoenaed to appear as a third party in supplementary proceedings, moved to vacate the subpoena on the ground that the judgment on which said proceedings were based had been discharged in bankruptcy. The motion was denied. An examination of the record on appeal in the action, submitted by stipulation on this appeal, furnishes conclusive evidence that the judgment was one rendered against the defendant in an action to recover damages for false and fraudulent representations in the sale of a mortgage. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 824, 9 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herschkowitz-v-keen-nyappdiv-1939.