Herschkowitz v. Arsenal Building Corporation
180 Misc. 931, 46 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2748
This text of 180 Misc. 931 (Herschkowitz v. Arsenal Building Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Herschkowitz v. Arsenal Building Corporation, 180 Misc. 931, 46 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).
Opinion
Plaintiff failed to establish either notice to the defendant or negligence on its part. (Miller v. Gimbel Bros., Inc., 262 N. Y. 107; Antenen v. New York Telephone Co.. 271 N. Y. 558.)
[932]*932Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Hammeb, Shientag and Elecht, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Antenen v. New York Telephone Company
2 N.E.2d 693 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Miller v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.
186 N.E. 410 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 931, 46 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herschkowitz-v-arsenal-building-corporation-nyappterm-1943.