Herscher v. Raleigh Hotel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herscher v. Raleigh Hotel Corp.

19 A.D.2d 896, 245 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 896 (Herscher v. Raleigh Hotel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herscher v. Raleigh Hotel Corp., 19 A.D.2d 896, 245 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the executrix of an estate seeking, inter alla, to compel the decedent’s former partners to account with respect to certain claimed assets of the estate, the defendants appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 27, 1963, which denied their motion, pursuant to rule 107 of the former Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint; and (2) from an order of said court, dated August 9, 1963, which, upon renewal of the motion qn additional papers, again denied the motion. Order of August 9, 1963 denying the renewed motion, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Defendant’s time to [897]*897answer the complaint extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Appeal from order of May 27, 1963 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the later order of August 9, 1963. [For prior appeal relating to this estate, see Matter of Gherkoff, 9 A D 2d 557, affg. 19 Mise 2d 69.] Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the executrix of an estate seeking, inter alla, to compel the decedent’s former partners to account with respect to certain claimed assets of the estate, the defendants appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 27, 1963, which denied their motion, pursuant to rule 107 of the former Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint; and (2) from an order of said court, dated August 9, 1963, which, upon renewal of the motion qn additional papers, again denied the motion. Order of August 9, 1963 denying the renewed motion, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Defendant’s time to [897]*897answer the complaint extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Appeal from order of May 27, 1963 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the later order of August 9, 1963. [For prior appeal relating to this estate, see Matter of Gherkoff, 9 A D 2d 557, affg. 19 Mise 2d 69.] Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 896, 245 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herscher-v-raleigh-hotel-corp-nyappdiv-1963.