Herscher v. Albert Enterprises, Inc.

252 So. 2d 863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 1971·No. No. 71-115·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict. The points relied upon for reversal all argue claimed procedural errors in the trial of the case or in the court’s handling of the post-trial motions. We hold that prejudicial error does not appear in the record. It has been frequently held that an appellate court will not reverse for a new trial upon procedural errors where it affirmatively appears that the claimed errors did not affect appellant’s right to a fair trial. Hill v. Sadler, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 52.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herscher v. Albert Enterprises, Inc., 252 So. 2d 863 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

252 So. 2d 863 (Herscher v. Albert Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Sadler
186 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)