Herschel Walter Brown v. Ira Shockley Attorney General of the State of Maryland
This text of 60 F.3d 820 (Herschel Walter Brown v. Ira Shockley Attorney General of the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Herschel Walter BROWN, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Ira SHOCKLEY; Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
Respondents--Appellees.
No. 95-6503.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 28, 1995.
Herschel Walter Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Shockley No. CA-95-688-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 820, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24751, 1995 WL 382107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herschel-walter-brown-v-ira-shockley-attorney-gene-ca4-1995.