Herrschaft v. Department of Corrections

934 A.2d 702
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 21, 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 934 A.2d 702 (Herrschaft v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herrschaft v. Department of Corrections, 934 A.2d 702 (Pa. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. The order under review initially observes that the Department may rely on a court order reflecting fines, costs, and restitution in implementing 42 Pa.C.S. § 9728, but then merely recites that the Department relied on a “communication” from the trial court (or more properly, the clerk of courts) indicating outstanding obligations. Such commentary was insufficient to support the award of summary relief.

We offer no opinion concerning the disposition of the petition for review on any other or related ground.

Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 9728
Pennsylvania § 9728

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
934 A.2d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrschaft-v-department-of-corrections-pa-2007.