Herrschaft v. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Herrschaft v. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections

966 A.2d 544

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 22, 2009·No. 53 MAP 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2009, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED, without prejudice to Appellant’s right to seek immediate relief in the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas. See Commonwealth v. Williams, 909 A.2d 419 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) (holding inmate’s challenge to county clerk of court’s assignment of costs should be filed in the trial court); Commonwealth v. Parella, 834 A.2d 1253 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003) (holding inmate’s complaint regarding Act 84 deductions should be filed in trial court *545 where inmate seeks to remove financial obligations improperly assigned to him).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2009, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED, without prejudice to Appellant’s right to seek immediate relief in the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas. See Commonwealth v. Williams, 909 A.2d 419 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) (holding inmate’s challenge to county clerk of court’s assignment of costs should be filed in the trial court); Commonwealth v. Parella, 834 A.2d 1253 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003) (holding inmate’s complaint regarding Act 84 deductions should be filed in trial court *545 where inmate seeks to remove financial obligations improperly assigned to him).

Herrschaft v. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections, 966 A.2d 544 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

966 A.2d 544 (Herrschaft v. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related