Herron v. Virginia Commonwealth University

116 F. App'x 467
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 7, 2004·No. 04-1701·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lesia Herron appeals the magistrate judge’s order * granting summary judgment for Virginia Commonwealth University (“VCU”) on her racial discrimination action brought under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Herron v. VCU, No. CA-03-590-3 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29, 2004). We deny Herron’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2000), the parties consented to exercise of the district court’s jurisdiction by a magistrate judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herron v. Virginia Commonwealth University, 116 F. App'x 467 (4th Cir. 2004).

116 F. App'x 467 (Herron v. Virginia Commonwealth University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related