Herron v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Herron v. State

308 S.W.3d 308, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 488, 2010 WL 1554897

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 20, 2010

DocketED 93156

StatusPublished

This text of 308 S.W.3d 308 (Herron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herron v. State, 308 S.W.3d 308, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 488, 2010 WL 1554897 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Herron (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI