Herron v. Pittsburgh

127 A. 64, 281 Pa. 401, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 632
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 13, 1924
DocketAppeal, 42
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 A. 64 (Herron v. Pittsburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herron v. Pittsburgh, 127 A. 64, 281 Pa. 401, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 632 (Pa. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this case, Mary Herron, a tenant, who had leased parts of a building after the passage of an ordinance providing for the widening of the street on which the structure was located, claimed against defendant city damages suffered by reason of the subsequent destruction of the demised premises in course of the municipal improvement, and the consequent extinguishment of the balance of her term. The trial court entered judgment on a verdict in her favor, and the city has appealed, asking that the judgment be reversed and entered for it.

The court below properly decided that Justice & Co. v. Phila., 169 Pa. 503, ruled the present case. See also Iron City Auto Co. v. Pittsburgh, 253 Pa. 478, 488.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballantyne Company v. City of Omaha
113 N.W.2d 486 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A. 64, 281 Pa. 401, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herron-v-pittsburgh-pa-1924.