Herron v. Patrolman 1

80 F. App'x 946
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 2003
Docket03-20590
StatusUnpublished

This text of 80 F. App'x 946 (Herron v. Patrolman 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herron v. Patrolman 1, 80 F. App'x 946 (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R.App. P., requires that the notice of appeal in a civil action be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment. In this civil rights action, the final judgment was entered on April 24, 2003. The final day for filing a timely notice of appeal was May 27, 2003. See Fed. R.App. P. 26(a)(3) (last day of period is excluded if it is Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday). Herron dated his pro se notice of appeal May 5, 2003 (within the appeal period), but the notice is stamped as filed on June 2, 2003 (outside the appeal period). A prisoner’s pro se notice of appeal is deemed timely filed if deposited in the institution’s internal mail system on or before the last day for filing. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1). As it cannot be determined from the record in this case whether Herron deposited his notice of appeal in the prison mail system on or before May 27, 2003, the case must be remanded to the district court to make such a determination. See Thompson v. Montgomery, 853 F.2d 287, 288 (5th Cir.1988).

Upon making this determination, the district court shall return the case to this court for further proceedings, or dismissal, as may be appropriate.

Herron’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED at this time.

REMANDED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marion Ray Mosley v. Officer M.D. Cozby
813 F.2d 659 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Kenneth G. Thompson, Jr. v. Robert E. Montgomery
853 F.2d 287 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 F. App'x 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herron-v-patrolman-1-ca5-2003.