Herrold v. Amrine

113 P.2d 1052, 153 Kan. 569, 1941 Kan. LEXIS 176
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided April 29, 1941·No. No. 35,282·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Petitioners’ application for a writ of habeas corpus ordered filed without deposit for costs.

Petitioners’ application to appoint counsel to represent them denied.

Petitioners’ application for writ of habeas corpus read, considered and denied on the ground that the matters of which they complain, if given the largest credence, could only have been brought before this court on appeal from the judgment and sentence imposed on their pleas of guilty in the district court of Jefferson county on November 30, 1937, as shown by the record appended to their application herein.

Application for the writ is denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrold v. Amrine, 113 P.2d 1052, 153 Kan. 569, 1941 Kan. LEXIS 176 (kan 1941).

113 P.2d 1052 (Herrold v. Amrine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kneisley v. Hudspeth
173 P.2d 247 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1946)