Herrold v. Amrine
This text of 113 P.2d 1052 (Herrold v. Amrine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioners’ application for a writ of habeas corpus ordered filed without deposit for costs.
Petitioners’ application to appoint counsel to represent them denied.
Petitioners’ application for writ of habeas corpus read, considered and denied on the ground that the matters of which they complain, if given the largest credence, could only have been brought before this court on appeal from the judgment and sentence imposed on their pleas of guilty in the district court of Jefferson county on November 30, 1937, as shown by the record appended to their application herein.
Application for the writ is denied and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 P.2d 1052, 153 Kan. 569, 1941 Kan. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrold-v-amrine-kan-1941.