Herrmann v. Herrmann
This text of 172 A.D. 944 (Herrmann v. Herrmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from should be reversed in so far as it denies the motion to make Henry M. Susswein, as administrator, etc., a party defendant, and affirmed in so far as it denies the motion to make Oscar Herrmann a party defendant, and to the extent stated the motion is granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal to the appellant against the administrator. Present—Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ. Order reversed as to Henry Susswein, as administrator, etc., and affirmed as to Oscar Herrmann, and motion granted to the extent stated in opinion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the administrator. Order to be settled on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A.D. 944, 157 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrmann-v-herrmann-nyappdiv-1916.