Herrmann v. Herrmann
This text of Herrmann v. Herrmann (Herrmann v. Herrmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000060 29-MAY-2015 08:08 AM
SCWC-12-0000060
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
KARYN EILEEN HERRMANN, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
KENNETH ROSS HERRMANN, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000060; FC-D NO. 95-0-0475)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee Karyn Eileen Herrmann’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on April 16, 2015, is
hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 29, 2015.
Francis T. O’Brien /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Charles T. Kleintop and Dyan M. Medeiros /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Herrmann v. Herrmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrmann-v-herrmann-haw-2015.