Herrmann v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. of Glens Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herrmann v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. of Glens Falls

255 A.D. 854, 7 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5653

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 854 (Herrmann v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. of Glens Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herrmann v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. of Glens Falls, 255 A.D. 854, 7 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, etc., reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead over within ten days from the entry of the order hereon, if so advised, upon payment of costs. It appears on the face of the complaint that plaintiff was bound to accept the bond in question, and it is immaterial that she was induced by false representations to do what she was bound to do. (Deobold v. Oppermann, 111 N. Y. 531.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, etc., reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead over within ten days from the entry of the order hereon, if so advised, upon payment of costs. It appears on the face of the complaint that plaintiff was bound to accept the bond in question, and it is immaterial that she was induced by false representations to do what she was bound to do. (Deobold v. Oppermann, 111 N. Y. 531.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 854, 7 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrmann-v-glens-falls-indemnity-co-of-glens-falls-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack