Herrington v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Herrington v. State

674 S.W.2d 505, 283 Ark. 231, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1558

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedSeptember 10, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 674 S.W.2d 505 (Herrington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herrington v. State, 674 S.W.2d 505, 283 Ark. 231, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1558 (Ark. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Michael Daniel Herrington, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Bruce D. Switzer, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Michael Daniel Herrington, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Bruce D. Switzer, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

674 S.W.2d 505, 283 Ark. 231, 1984 Ark. LEXIS 1558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrington-v-state-ark-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack