Herrington v. Parham
This text of 142 S.E. 858 (Herrington v. Parham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was held by this court in Columbia Trust & Realty Co. v. Alston, 163 Ga. 83 (135 S. E. 431) : - “When [206]*206property is sold and conveyed bjr a common grantor at different times and to different purchasers, and taxes having a lien on all the property sold are due, the last property sold is primarily bound for the payment of all such taxes.” The ruling there made related to a case which upon its facts is not distinguishable from the case now under consideration. It follows that upon application of the principle ruled in that case the trial judge did not err in overruling the demurrers to the original petition and to the petition for intervention, and in granting the interlocutory injunction. See also Merchants National Bank of Rome v. McWilliams, 107 Ga. 532 (33 S. E. 860). The case differs on its facts from the case of Hollinshed v. Woodard, 124 Ga. 721 (52 S. E. 815).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 S.E. 858, 166 Ga. 204, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrington-v-parham-ga-1928.