Herrington v. Jones
This text of 63 S.E. 832 (Herrington v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under tlie terms of the contract, for a breach of which the action was brought to recover damages, certain obligations were imposed upon the plaintiff, a compliance with which was a condition precedent to the exercise of the’right and privilege which he claimed under the contract, and a prevention of the exercise of which right was alleged as constituting the breach; and' it not appearing from the petition that the plaintiff had complied with such condition, he showed no right in himself to maintain the action as brought, and the court did not err in so holding and dismissing the case upon demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 S.E. 832, 132 Ga. 209, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrington-v-jones-ga-1909.