Herrington v. Flanders

42 S.E. 222, 115 Ga. 823, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 610
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 17, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pish, J.

1. Under the Penal Code, § 1079, it is manifestly unlawful to charge the accused in a criminal case, upon his conviction, with “ the costs of any witness of the State, unless such witness was subpoenaed, sworn, and examined on the trial.” The prohibition in that section against charging the accused, except as therein indicated, with the costs of “more than two witnesses to the same point” relates, of course, only to witnesses who have actually been “subpoenaed, sworn, and examined.”

2. Under the law above announced, the superior court erred in not sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herrington v. Flanders, 42 S.E. 222, 115 Ga. 823, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 610 (Ga. 1902).

42 S.E. 222 (Herrington v. Flanders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Means
95 S.E. 912 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
United States v. Miller
223 F. 183 (S.D. Georgia, 1915)