Herrington v. Aetna Insurance
228 A.D.2d 680, 644 N.Y.2d 992, 644 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7392
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 1996
StatusPublished
This text of 228 A.D.2d 680 (Herrington v. Aetna Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Herrington v. Aetna Insurance, 228 A.D.2d 680, 644 N.Y.2d 992, 644 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
The Supreme Court erred in holding that the reduction in coverage clause was enforceable (see, Matter of Paolilli v Aetna Ins. Co., 228 AD2d 683 [decided herewith]). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Paolilli v. Aetna Insurance
228 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 680, 644 N.Y.2d 992, 644 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrington-v-aetna-insurance-nyappdiv-1996.