Herring & Walker v. Marvin

New York Supreme Court

Herring & Walker v. Marvin

5 Johns. 393

DecidedFebruary 15, 1810

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Johns. 393 (Herring & Walker v. Marvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herring & Walker v. Marvin, 5 Johns. 393 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a clear case. The defendants gave their notes, pursuant to the arrangement made with the plaintiffs, and for their accommodation. The property of the wheat was never vested in the defendants ; nor did they take any agency in the sale of it. It was sold by Keeler, as the agent of the plaintiffs. This is an unjust attempt to charge the defendants, who are not legally responsible.

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a clear case. The defendants gave their notes, pursuant to the arrangement made with the plaintiffs, and for their accommodation. The property of the wheat was never vested in the defendants ; nor did they take any agency in the sale of it. It was sold by Keeler, as the agent of the plaintiffs. This is an unjust attempt to charge the defendants, who are not legally responsible.

Judgment for the defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Johns. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-walker-v-marvin-nysupct-1810.