Herring v. Thompson
This text of Herring v. Thompson (Herring v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1647
RICARDO C. HERRING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOMMY G. THOMPSON, Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01- 3824-8-AMD)
Submitted: May 26, 2004 Decided: June 28, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard L. Swick, David H. Shapiro, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ricardo C. Herring appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Herring’s
action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Herring v. Thompson, CA-01-3824-8-AMD (D. Md. May 12, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Herring v. Thompson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-thompson-ca4-2004.