Herring v. State
This text of 532 So. 2d 1328 (Herring v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following our decision in Herring v. State, 501 So.2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), defendant was retried. Upon conviction, the trial court imposed a sentence in violation of the rule set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 12 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). We therefore affirm the convictions and the sentence on Count II; vacate the sentence on Count I; and remand for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
532 So. 2d 1328, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2444, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4772, 1988 WL 114728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.