Herring v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co.

95 S.E. 14, 21 Ga. App. 747, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 511
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 7, 1918
Docket8477
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 14 (Herring v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herring v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co., 95 S.E. 14, 21 Ga. App. 747, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in connection with the entire charge of the court, there is not, in the excerpts complained of in the motion for a new trial, sufficient' error to authorize a reversal.- Mere inaccuracies of expression, or slight errors which are not likely to obscure the meaning of the court or mislead the jury, will not authorize this court to set aside a verdict, where the charge is otherwise correct.

2. There was evidence to support the verdict, and the court properly refused a new trial..

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 14, 21 Ga. App. 747, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-southern-states-phosphate-fertilizer-co-gactapp-1918.