Herring v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co.
This text of 95 S.E. 14 (Herring v. Southern States Phosphate & Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. When considered in connection with the entire charge of the court, there is not, in the excerpts complained of in the motion for a new trial, sufficient' error to authorize a reversal.- Mere inaccuracies of expression, or slight errors which are not likely to obscure the meaning of the court or mislead the jury, will not authorize this court to set aside a verdict, where the charge is otherwise correct.
2. There was evidence to support the verdict, and the court properly refused a new trial..
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 S.E. 14, 21 Ga. App. 747, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-southern-states-phosphate-fertilizer-co-gactapp-1918.