Herring v. Smith
This text of Herring v. Smith (Herring v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Angela Marie Herring,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-0068 (JDB) Debra Smith,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM
Defendant removed this action from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and
now moves to dismiss the complaint under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. By Order of January 23, 2013, plaintiff was advised to respond to defendant’s
motion by February 19, 2013, and was warned that her failure to respond might result in
dismissal of the case on what the Court would treat as a conceded motion. Plaintiff has not filed
a response to the motion or sought additional time to respond. Hence, the Court will grant
defendant’s motion as conceded and will dismiss this case for the reasons defendant has
advanced in her supporting memorandum. See generally Mem. of P. & A. in Support of Def.’s
Mot. to Dismiss [Dkt. # 3-1]. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum.
_____________/s/______________ JOHN D. BATES DATE: March 12, 2013 United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Herring v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-smith-dcd-2013.