Herring v. . R. R.
75 S.E. 994, 160 N.C. 252, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 146
Opinion
The decision in Mule Co. v. R. R., ante, 215, controls this, and upon that authority the judgment is affirmed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herring v. . R. R., 75 S.E. 994, 160 N.C. 252, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 146 (N.C. 1912).
75 S.E. 994 (Herring v. . R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Wilkerson
247 S.E.2d 905 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)
Flyzik v. Travelers Insurance
145 P.2d 539 (Washington Supreme Court, 1944)
Patrick v. . Treadwell
21 S.E.2d 818 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Patrick ex rel. Patrick v. Treadwell
222 N.C. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
State v. Acklus
217 P. 61 (Washington Supreme Court, 1923)