Herring v. Queen City Coach Co.
57 S.E.2d 307, 231 N.C. 430, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 668
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Herring v. Queen City Coach Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 234 N.C. 51 →
Opinion
The right to the benefits of the provisions of G.S. 1-78, as to venue for “actions against executors and administrators in their official capacity” would seem to rest with the executor or administrator as the case may be. Such right does not exist as to third parties. Hence, the court properly denied defendant’s motion for the removal of the action.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herring v. Queen City Coach Co., 57 S.E.2d 307, 231 N.C. 430, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 668 (N.C. 1950).
57 S.E.2d 307 (Herring v. Queen City Coach Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.