Herring v. Queen City Coach Co.
57 S.E.2d 307, 231 N.C. 430, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 668
This text of 57 S.E.2d 307 (Herring v. Queen City Coach Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Herring v. Queen City Coach Co., 57 S.E.2d 307, 231 N.C. 430, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 668 (N.C. 1950).
Opinion
The right to the benefits of the provisions of G.S. 1-78, as to venue for “actions against executors and administrators in their official capacity” would seem to rest with the executor or administrator as the case may be. Such right does not exist as to third parties. Hence, the court properly denied defendant’s motion for the removal of the action.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 S.E.2d 307, 231 N.C. 430, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herring-v-queen-city-coach-co-nc-1950.