Herring, Ltd. v. Canyon-Lincoln Mercury, Inc.

548 P.2d 625, 1976 Utah LEXIS 796
Utah Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 1976·No. No. 13974·Published

Opinion

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a judgment in favor of Canyon, lessor and defendant, in a damage suit brought by Herring, Lessee, for failure of the lessor to comply with the terms of a lease having to do with a used car lot facility. Affirmed with costs to Canyon.

The gravamen of this case is property primarily to be employed in selling used cars. The lessee wanted to sublet a garage area for a body repair and paint shop. He was not allowed to rent the area unless substantial repairs were made to satisfy the city fire ordinances. Herring thereupon demanded that Canyon make the repairs. The latter refused, and Herring returned the keys and left, to file this damage suit based on alleged breach of contract, assigning impossibility as a reason therefor, and citing Sine v. Rudy1 as authority.

The main purpose of the lease being to sell used cars, and not to operate a body repair and paint shop, the Sine case is not [626]*626dispositive or pertinent, nor are the well known Coronation cases familiar to students and practitioners.

ELLETT, CROCKETT, TUCKETT and MAUGHAN, TL, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herring, Ltd. v. Canyon-Lincoln Mercury, Inc., 548 P.2d 625, 1976 Utah LEXIS 796 (Utah 1976).

548 P.2d 625 (Herring, Ltd. v. Canyon-Lincoln Mercury, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sine v. Rudy
493 P.2d 299 (Utah Supreme Court, 1972)