Herrin v. Herrin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Herrin v. Herrin

171 S.E.2d 143, 225 Ga. 692, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 615

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 6, 1969

Docket25452

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 S.E.2d 143 (Herrin v. Herrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herrin v. Herrin, 171 S.E.2d 143, 225 Ga. 692, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 615 (Ga. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Undercofler, Justice.

This appeal was docketed in this court on August 22, 1969. No enumeration of error was filed until September 9, 1969. Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29, § 14, as amended by Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243, and Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1077 (Code Ann. § 6-810), requires that the enumeration of error be filed at the time the brief is filed, which time is set by Rule 20 of this court at 10 days after the docketing of the case in this court. Under Rule 14, failure to file the enumeration of error within the time specified in the rules for the filing of the brief may be deemed as failure W perfect the appeal. Rules of the Supreme Court, 221 Ga. 884. See Napier v. Napier, 222 Ga. 681 (151 SE2d 712); Benfield v. State, 224 Ga. 139 (160 SE2d 398); and DeFee v. Williams, [693]*693224 Ga. 354 (162 SE2d 440). Since there was a failure to perfect the appeal within the meaning of Rule 14, the appeal is

Submitted October 14, 1969 Decided November 6, 1969. Maylon K. London, for appellant. Robert F. Oliver, for appellee.

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Undercofler, Justice.

This appeal was docketed in this court on August 22, 1969. No enumeration of error was filed until September 9, 1969. Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29, § 14, as amended by Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243, and Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1077 (Code Ann. § 6-810), requires that the enumeration of error be filed at the time the brief is filed, which time is set by Rule 20 of this court at 10 days after the docketing of the case in this court. Under Rule 14, failure to file the enumeration of error within the time specified in the rules for the filing of the brief may be deemed as failure W perfect the appeal. Rules of the Supreme Court, 221 Ga. 884. See Napier v. Napier, 222 Ga. 681 (151 SE2d 712); Benfield v. State, 224 Ga. 139 (160 SE2d 398); and DeFee v. Williams, [693]*693224 Ga. 354 (162 SE2d 440). Since there was a failure to perfect the appeal within the meaning of Rule 14, the appeal is

Submitted October 14, 1969 Decided November 6, 1969. Maylon K. London, for appellant. Robert F. Oliver, for appellee.

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 S.E.2d 143, 225 Ga. 692, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herrin-v-herrin-ga-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack